Skip to main content

Part 3) Strategies: The “Art of Deep Background” and Controlling the Press

From Seeing Through the Illusion: Understanding Apple’s Mastery of the Media, a profile examining Apple’s PR strategy:

MEdia

Apple’s PR department presents a cool, measured public-facing image: it only responds to press inquiries when it wants to, doesn’t offer quotes unless they’ll be reprinted without criticism, and responds directly only when it determines that something needs to be said by “Apple” rather than “sources familiar with the matter.” You could picture Apple’s PR strategy as the work of a wise, wealthy, and not particularly friendly queen – one always too busy to be bothered, until for some reason, she’s not.

So it’s a surprise that Apple actually isn’t that detached from the media: it’s more like a teenage girl obsessively keeping her fingers on the pulse of coverage. Members of Apple PR seek tabloid photos of celebrities holding iPhones, while others read Apple-focused blogs actively, and keep tabs on prominent Apple beat writers using anonymized social media accounts. A former Apple PR employee notes that the team enjoys being an “overall watchdog,” monitoring what the media is saying about the company every day. This oversight is so important to Apple that a few times a week, top executives are sent a document detailing the company’s latest press coverage. When Apple is not pleased with coverage, it sometimes works to shift the narrative, even attempting to undermine giant news organizations.

When Apple realized that The New York Times was gunning to win the Pulitzer Prize for its controversial iEconomy series on the Apple supply chain, Apple’s PR team sent articles criticizing The New York Times to other journalists, according to a person familiar with the strategy. Other people say that Apple used a similar approach to dispute some background information in Steve Jobs’ authorized biography by author Walter Isaacson, going after details that had not been directly provided by Jobs or Apple. Similarly, a journalist who covered Apple noted that the company will pitch a story in a specific way, and would “get annoyed” if the journalist wants to expand on the topic, or not use the angle that Apple was pitching.

Most recently, Apple utilized covert tactics to challenge a Reuters story about Apple’s accessibility practicesReuters referred to Apple as a champion of the blind community, but called for the company to do even more work in the accessibility field. Unable to get Apple to comment for the story, the article quoted a 2013 Tim Cook speech to underscore Apple’s understanding of accessibility’s importance. Despite being unwilling to officially participate, Apple asked Reuters off the record to include more quotes from Cook’s speech, said a person familiar with the situation. Reuters declined, since the speech is publicly available material. Instead of commenting on-the-record before or after the article was published, Apple’s PR team disapprovingly pointed a loyal group of Apple-focused bloggers to the entire 2013 speech transcript, and these bloggers then used the supplied details to attack Reuters. As Fortune put it, “it didn’t take long for [Apple’s] friends in the media (with some gentle prodding from Apple PR) to strike back.” Despite being aware of the entire process, and having the opportunity to be positively, publicly involved, Apple publicly said nothing.

Saying little on-the-record is a classic Apple PR strategy.

“Their strategy is to say nothing; it keeps everyone guessing what Apple is up to, generates free publicity, and keeps them out of the trouble everyone gets into,” said a journalist with access to Apple PR. “Once you start answering questions, you get your foot in your mouth.” As a former member of Apple PR put it, “everything [related to Apple PR] is done strategically,” noting that “a lot of people don’t give credit to the art form of working on background.” This strategy is often executed when reporters contact Apple PR for comment or confirmation on a story. “If you were totally off-base, I would tell you” is the closest Apple will typically get to confirming a story that didn’t originate with the PR team, according to journalists at multiple major news outlets.

Other writers say that Apple will indirectly confirm or deny claims by sharing an analysis of the past track record of the particular author who originally wrote a story in question. Off-the-record, the company has warned journalists off of following the paths of other writers, or suggested that a relationship problem with Apple would be avoided if the journalist opts not to cover certain topics. These discussions can be helpful or stifling for the writer, but they’re generally all positive for Apple, which has the opportunity to shape what’s said.

Jobs covers

In past years, Steve Jobs and Katie Cotton would meet with magazine publishers and big-name newspaper journalists to talk about Apple’s plans. Since the discussions were completely off-the-record, the “information would be useless,” according to a person with knowledge of the meetings. Yet these editors still were being given “insight into the company,” which led to glowing profiles of Apple, according to the source. Jobs and Cotton maintained this strategy well into the age of Internet publications, as “Jobs’s view of the media was stuck in the newspapers he had in house growing up,” according to another connected journalist who covers Apple.

Another cornerstone tactic of Apple PR was playing publications against each other, according to Brian Lam, founder of The Wirecutter and former head of Gizmodo. When print magazines dominated, Jobs could get either Newsweek or TIME to promote Apple on the front cover by making them compete against each other for an exclusive. Lam explained that “you can’t convince them to give you a cover, but you can convince them to take a cover from a competitor.” As technology blogs became more important, Jobs played rivals Gizmodo and Engadget against each other, publicly complimenting the freewheeling Gizmodo‘s work in front of the more serious Engadget‘s then-editor Ryan Block. Says Lam, “this didn’t come from a position of weakness or manipulation, it was a power game.” Jockeying for more favorable coverage was “not any different from how Apple would strike their media deals or their supply chain deals to get the best prices.”

But this strategy did not always work. A person briefed on the situation recalls that upon Lam receiving an iPhone 3GS review unit in 2009, a top Apple executive told the former Gizmodo editor that “we’re giving you a phone before Walt Mossberg.” Since Mossberg was known to be a close friend of Steve Jobs, some people would have taken this as a major compliment. But Lam is said to have felt that Apple “didn’t understand the pride of a reporter,” and started pushing away from Apple.

Nonetheless, the strategies weren’t taken personally by Lam, nor by some of the other journalists we spoke with. The media “is just part of their plan,” said Lam. “They think big, not always about the people, it’s business.”

As another journalist who covers Apple put it, “when they want you, they come to you, but when they don’t want to answer a question or it doesn’t suit their needs, you’re lucky to get a call back at all.” A former member of Apple’s PR team acknowledged the imbalance in the relationship between Apple PR and journalists, which was not necessarily reciprocal – rather, it was one-sided in favor of Apple, with fewer real benefits to the journalist. Another former Apple employee said, It’s not about you, it’s about the company and it’s about the product.”

Apple’s PR team isn’t above quietly spreading negative press about competitors. For instance, when a publication “has written something negative about Android, [Apple PR] would send those stories around,” telling writers something like “that’s how we feel.” As just one example, Apple PR sent this email to two 9to5Mac reporters earlier this week, attempting to underscore an Android app’s failures.

ApplePR

While Apple’s PR strategies seem particularly manipulative, other technology companies try similar tactics. One reporter who covers a number of technology companies opined that “the huge difference is that people love Apple, and Apple PR knows it.” With that in mind, Apple “understands that they’re giving [journalists] a favor,” says Lam. “Apple knows it has something other journalists want,” another reporter says, “the plays are the same [as other companies’] but the motivations are different.”

“Where they are perceived as ruthless is that they know it and take super advantage of it,” the writer added. The bloggers who helped Apple PR shoot down the aforementioned Reuters accessibility story ostensibly did so as individuals, but their efforts had been quickly coordinated by the company for a specific purpose. Said a journalist, “any other company would provide the ammunition to do what you need to do; the difference is that Apple has a war machine that is ready to strike at any time.” And every effective war machine needs a leader.

— See Part 4) The Departure of a “Tyrant”

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

You’re reading 9to5Mac — experts who break news about Apple and its surrounding ecosystem, day after day. Be sure to check out our homepage for all the latest news, and follow 9to5Mac on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn to stay in the loop. Don’t know where to start? Check out our exclusive stories, reviews, how-tos, and subscribe to our YouTube channel

Comments

  1. Computer_Whiz123 - 10 years ago

    ‘And controlling the press’ lol

    • William Brown - 10 years ago

      Complete, total and utter silence from armies of Apple fanboy’s….. then again being able to think for yourself and being an Apple user are mutually exclusive.

      • Lars Pallesen - 10 years ago

        Nope, not silent. I think it’s fascinating and interesting to read about the inner workings of Apple’s secret PR work that we are normally not privy to. But there’s just nothing shocking or even surprising about it to us long time Apple observers. This is the way that Apple PR has always been rumored to work. The only read difference is that Apple plays this game better than any of its competitors.

      • Computer_Whiz123 - 10 years ago

        I could say the same about fandroids

      • mdelvecchio99 - 10 years ago

        William Brown: individual thinker, lone wolf and maverick…or dipshit at large?

      • redprose - 10 years ago

        Maybe you completely skipped over this line: “While Apple’s PR strategies seem particularly manipulative, other technology companies try similar tactics.”

        As a “fanboy,” this is nothing new. Apple is like Willy Wonka in how it handles the press. This is part of their success, and it’s something that’s utterly fascinating. The difference between how Apple does it and other companies like Samsung do it? Apple’s good at it, and people love Apple.

  2. IMO – (for legal reasons)

    One can figure most of this out by reading the Apple reviews and articles. I have written many newspapers and bloggers about their ridiculous self promoting Apple coverage and of course they deny it, saying their readers are simply “demanding” the Apple coverage.

    When you see regular full page ads in a newspaper like the LA Times paid by Apple, you can bet that their Business Section will have many a glowing article about Apple products and more or less ignore the Apple competitors. One thing you will never see is an article showing where Consumer Reports (not ad supported) rates the I-Phone 8th in terms of overall quality and performance vs. Android competitors. These same newspapers will quote Consumers Reports ratings on a host of other products like cars and other electronic items, but NEVER on I-Phone vs. the competition ratings because the 8th place rating would offend Apple and jeopardize advertising revenue.

    BGR and the VERGE as well as a host of blogger sites constantly “tease” Apple hyped news. When you see articles with terms like “The internet is buzzing with anticipation over next months Apple upcoming product release… etc,etc” you know Apple is behind the article. The only buzzing going on it Apple’s PR department sending out articles that are recommended for print.

    If you believe in their objectivity, your really naïve.

    Wm Randolph Hurst would be proud of this controlling of the press… he was the master.

  3. Jan Vlach (@skawagon) - 10 years ago

    It seems to me that certain websites, especially Walt Mossberg’s Re/code an the Verge are writing solely in favor of apple. I noticed this lastly when I red about their article concerning Bendgate and even noticed it in their look at new BB Passport.

  4. Max Lavache - 7 years ago

    Apple is evil. How can you trust a company blatantly seeking for total mind control of it’s users? Apple is a sect and many journalists are members. Since they blatantly devoted their souls to Apple they became dirty propagandists. They are totally shameless when they see how Apple can lie and distort facts.

    Apple has total control on journalists because Jobs have sold to the media owners the idea that it could be possible to have total mind control over everybody througt a tight control of information and communication technologies. That’s why the media big bosses want you to use only Apple devices and are making massive free advertisement and blantant propaganda for Apple, so they are sure that you won’t escape from their propaganda. And it’s working. Internet was a free space to counter the mainstream propaganda on the same foot of equality. Apple Google and app-centered internet (so-called Web 2.0) is the contrary, you’re not on the same foot but you are totaly enslaved to the device maker who can censor you at will. The purpose of Apple is to “Jail” Internet in tightly controlled apps trough tightly controled devices.

    Apple is a totalitarism. Steve Jobs and his successor Tim Cook are the most EVIL people on Earth. Tim Cook is liying as he is breathing. Being fan of them is like being fan of Goebbels according to me. How can be “fan” of the way someone is liying, at least you are a dishonest liar too. Is it a “talent” to lie to people and constantly distort the facts to spin failures as “success”? 90% of Apple fanboys beliefs about computing are false and propaganda from Apple. Some of them still believe that there’s no viruses on Macs, until now.

    Apple’s propaganda is a poison that kills people’s brains. It’s pure brainwashing. They believe S. Jobs has invented all computing on Earth. They believe in lies and propaganda, and they seem to love it, they say “it’s bad, but brillantly done”. I can “brillantly” rob your wallet but would you appreciate it? But when it’s come to Apple fanatics have no brain anymore. Some of them are really “in touch” with Apple’s philosophy because they like the way Apple is liying and they want to be part of the dominant liars club. They are like the early nazis, and their high tech medias for the time (radio, theatre movies, high circulation newspappers, this was brand new tech in the 30s like smartphones and internet now). I hate Apple because it’s not a tech company, it’s a sect seeking for power and total control over the media, since the begining.