Skip to main content

60 percent of apps fail basic privacy tests, finds international cross-governmental study

 

A review of 1,211 apps carried out by a coalition of privacy officials across 19 countries found that 60 percent of them failed at least one basic privacy test, reports the WSJ.

The officials found that 60% of apps raised privacy concerns, based on three criteria: They did not disclose how they used personal information; they required that the user give up an excessive amount of personal data as a condition of downloading the app; and their privacy policies were rendered in type too small to be read on a phone’s screen …

The review was carried out by the Global Privacy Enforcement Network, an international body whose members include the U.S. Federal Trade Commission.

The most common issue, found in 43 percent of apps, was failing to make privacy disclosures readable on a small screen. While pinch-to-zoom is available in iOS, the need to scroll horizontally as well as vertically would make it impractical to find out what it is we’re agreeing to.

31 percent of apps requested access to personal data like location and contacts without explaining how the information would be used, and 30 percent provided no privacy information of any kind.

The U.S. government has been considering making it a legal requirement for apps to contain privacy policies, but the idea took a year to reach the proposal stage and more than a year after that still hasn’t made it into legislation. The European Union last year issued guidelines for mobile app developers, but these are recommendations only.

Apple has put rules in place for apps using its HealthKit platform in iOS 8, among them that apps must have a privacy policy and that data must not be shared with third-parties, used for data-mining or stored on the cloud.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

You’re reading 9to5Mac — experts who break news about Apple and its surrounding ecosystem, day after day. Be sure to check out our homepage for all the latest news, and follow 9to5Mac on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn to stay in the loop. Don’t know where to start? Check out our exclusive stories, reviews, how-tos, and subscribe to our YouTube channel

Comments

  1. Gregory Wright - 10 years ago

    Whew! Before I started to read the article I was expecting to see examples of actual invasions of privacy.

  2. Computer_Whiz123 - 10 years ago

    This could be somewhat useful…

  3. PMZanetti - 10 years ago

    Go away US government. We don’t need you. As usual.

    Apple can and will address whatever misuses of disclosure or privacy occur through its own cultivation of the store.

  4. Taste_of_Apple - 10 years ago

    Yikes

  5. Eric Tony (@nearmeLLC) - 10 years ago

    What apps? Are we talking just Apple apps? Any kind of mobile apps? Android, Apple, Microsoft, Blackberry, Nokia, and five hundred other kinds? Be specific. This is just a way to sell scare. And it’s bullshit.

  6. Jan Souček (@jansoucek) - 10 years ago

    “they required that the user give up an excessive amount of personal data as a condition of downloading the app”
    anyone else thinks they are talking about Android apps? this is simply not possible for iOS developers. your app have to work regardless of the permission that end user grants you.

    • Ben Lovejoy - 10 years ago

      I’m not sure how that could be the case? If I create a navigation app and you refuse permission to share your location, the app isn’t going to work.

Author

Avatar for Ben Lovejoy Ben Lovejoy

Ben Lovejoy is a British technology writer and EU Editor for 9to5Mac. He’s known for his op-eds and diary pieces, exploring his experience of Apple products over time, for a more rounded review. He also writes fiction, with two technothriller novels, a couple of SF shorts and a rom-com!


Ben Lovejoy's favorite gear