Search Results for tmobile

For "tmobile"
Site default logo image

Will Tmobile's lower priced plans for Google's Nexus One push down AT&T's iPhone plans?

Tmobile’s got a nationwide 7.2mbps HSDPA network that is compatible with the 3G radios on phones from Europe and Asia.  Compared to AT&T who has a different radio frequency for 3G and are still working on the 7.2mbps network, that’s pretty solid.  They also have the lowest-priced unlimited data plans of any US carrier which helps the Nexus One come in $500-$1000+ less over the two year contract (the difference in the phone cost is $20) than the iPhone…and even the Verizon Droid.  

Will AT&T lower their prices to compete with Tmobile?

Breakdown from BillShrink is below.

Site default logo image

Munster plots 2010 for the iPhone, here are some additional predictions

Gene Munster gave his 2010 iPhone predictions today.  His points are well thought out but we’ve got some additional thoughts that might be of interest.

1. He’s giving Verizon a 70% shot at getting the iPhone in 2010.  The chances are probably much lower than that, even though we’ve heard Apple and Verizon had been talking since 2007.  These agreements, when signed, are thought out waaay in advance and you only have to look at the commercials currently on TV to see Verizon and Apple aren’t building for an alliance.  All I see is bridges burning.  You think they can patch things up, sign agreements and build new EVDO hardware for Apple’s summertime launch?  I don’t.

Plus, Verizon’s CEO plainly told the WSJ “no iPhone until LTE is deployed“.

Site default logo image

Google's Nexus One phone announced on all four US carriers

Even though the Nexus One has had a slow start on Tmobile, you have to believe that the current flagship Android phone will have a little bit more success on AT&T...and Verizon… and now on Sprint.  That’s right.  You can now get a Google Nexus One on any of the four large US mobile networks.  They now have to compete to offer better service and lower prices to consumers.

Apple? 

Let’s just say we’re hoping for a summer surprise.

Site default logo image

iPad will be

This one from Setteb.it.  Tmobile.de, in their irrational exuberance for the iPad, posted a page with iPad pricing to their Website today but then quickly removed it. 

It is interesting that Apple is still selling these through the mobile carrier, since half of the product matrix doesn’t have 3G. 

Also, interesting that Tmobile has already begun rolling out their website as Apple said “they’re currently working out deals with providers”.  The site didn’t provide what rate the 3G plans would cost Europeans.

Full product matrix below:

Site default logo image

Apple lifts VoIP over 3G limitation, iCall launches

You can now make and receive VoIP calls over 3G on the iPhone (and iPad?!) according to iCall’s most recent press release.  Apple updated the terms of the SDK to allow VoIP calls over 3G even though some operators, like Tmobile in Germany, don’t allow VoIP calls on their network.  iCall also has push notifications, rounding out a pretty impressive specs list — one that finally makes VoIP a first-class citizen on the iPhone.  

Will Skype follow or tack on some more excuses?

Site default logo image

Only three more days of AT&T exclusivity on the iPhone?

HotHardware reports that AT&T’s exclusivity on the iPhone is a mere three days from being over.   That would mean the announcement on Wednesday might not only be about Tabletmania, it might also be the ushering in of new mobile carrier partner(s) in the US.  The report stopped short of naming Verizon, but it did mention that AT&T was sick of having the iPhone “hurt its image”:

Inside of AT&T, we are hearing that the iPhone is causing more trouble than ever before. On some level, having the iPhone is hurting AT&T’s image. Because they are the only company to carry it, and it’s such a data hog, it’s largely to blame for AT&T’s network troubles. We don’t remember hearing about AT&T’s “horrible network” before the iPhone–do you? The iPhone itself doesn’t really handle the switch from 3G to EDGE very well, so calls that are in-progress tend to fail whenever the 3G bands aren’t optimal and the phone attempts to step down to EDGE. It seems that AT&T is tired of taking the heat for this, and at this point, they may be smart to just let another carrier take some of those customers who are most inclined to complain.

Site default logo image

AT&T Wireless CEO implies iPhone exclusivity in U.S. to end

Matt Hamblin at Computerworld writes:

AT&T Mobility CEO Ralph de la Vega strongly implied today that the carrier’s exclusive deal to sell the iPhone in the U.S. is ending, although he gave no details in a conference call with analysts…"We have a legacy of having a great portfolio…that will continue after the iPhone is no longer exclusive to us," de la Vega said. "We think we will continue after the iPhone…to drive [results]…."

AT&T announced earlier today that iPhones were 75% of their new Smartphone activations and brought 40% of their customers from other carriers so losing exclusivity might not be in their best interests.  Interestingly,  de la Vega noted the advantages of AT&T’s 3G technology (talking and using data at the same time) vs. Verizon/Sprint’s services which lose data when a voice call is initiated. 

He also talked up Android devices and eBook readers saying:

Site default logo image

T-Mobile USA covers its jailbroken iPhone customers

T-Mobile, the company that carries the iPhone in Germany and a few other countries, does not have access to the iPhone in the US…Officially. However, it is known that many people jailbreak their iPhones to be on TMobile, for whatever reason. 

The Consumerist follows a story where T-Mobile is supporting a phone they don’t offer and awarding a service credit

T-mobile recently changed some aspect of their voicemail system, which cause iPhones (and some other unlocked non T-mobile branded phones) on their network to FREAK OUT. You’d get blank text messages from the future (2012!) when people left voicemails, and calling voicemail caused a flurry of the blank texts to arrive. These were notably NOT free texts either, so you were being charged per message if you didn’t have an unlimited plan. Some iPhone users on T-mobile’s network e-mailed Executive Customer Service, and got a very nice phone call in response, acknowledging the problem and awarding a 1-month service credit.

The T-mo rep stated that "T-Mobile, though they do not offer the iPhone, and that they are committed to supporting users on their network who have them."

Sure enough, within a day or so, in response to the problem, a T-mobile Tier 2 service rep posted an acknowledgment of the problem in a hackintosh forum, and indicated they’d fixed the issue.

All in all, this cements my loyalty to T-mobile. Even without officially supporting a particular phone, they are willing to make accommodations to ensure the iPhone users on their network continue to enjoy good service. And, it is worth noting, can continue to do so for tens of dollar less per month than they would if they were still using a 2G iPhone on AT&T.

Site default logo image

Taiwan Economic News: 9.6-inch, PA Semi Apple Tablet due in February, cost $800-$1000

We went a few weeks without a tablet rumor – which was scary – but the Taiwan Economic News chimes in today with a bunch of parts information on Apple’s forthcoming Tablet.  From reports from Dynapro, a battery supplier, they expect to build 300,000 units/month.  Wintek is again said to be the supplier of the touch panels, which they also build for the iPhone.

The tablet PC features a 9.6-inch screen, finger-touch function and built-in HSPDA (high speed download packet access) module, and adopts a P.A. SEMI processor chip and long lasting battery pack, selling for between US$799 and US$999. DynaPack International Technology Corp. has been exclusively contracted to supply up to 300,000 units of long lasting battery packs a month for Apple`s newest tablet PCs.

Site default logo image

The strange tale of VoIP and the Telcos (Updated)

We don’t follow Android as closely as we probably should, so this is news to us:  Today’s USA Today says that Google is using an entirely different VoIP neutering strategy at the behest of Tmobile.  AT&T forbids Apple from allowing VoIP applications from running on their network.  T-Mobile makes Android use theirs according to the report.

Apple does allow VoIP applications over Wifi (or at least they had until Google Voice came along), esentially because AT&T doesn’t control any part of that ecosystem.  For instance, should Apple kill Google Voice functionality on the iPod touch because AT&T doesn’t want it on the iPhone?