I’ll admit, when I first heard that Ashton Kutcher would be the star of a movie about Steve Jobs, I was less than thrilled. How could someone from That 70’s Show ever accurately portray one of the most influential figures in technology of all time? These negative thoughts in mind, I was pleasantly surprised with ‘Jobs’, which opened nationwide yesterday.


‘Jobs’ opens with Steve walking onstage in 2001 to introduce the original iPod at Apple’s Town Hall. I was nervous right away. While Ashton sure sounded, walked, and looked like Steve, the entire scene just seemed a little off. Fortunately, this was a brief opener, and the scene cuts back to Steve’s college days. Although the first 10 minutes or so of the film start a little slow, the plot quickly becomes fascinating. Even to me, someone who has heard the story of how Apple came to be dozens of times before. Early on in the film, we begin to see Steve’s character take shape as he scams his friend Steve Wozniak out of more than $2000 after asking him to help with a project he was working on at Atari. I was glad to see that the film doesn’t strive to portray Steve Jobs as some larger-than-life hero, but, instead, presents a fair look at his character and personality, which, at often times, was less than charming. For those learning about Steve’s life for the first time watching this film, it’ll provide quite a shock.

Much of the remainder of the film progresses like you’d expect- assuming you know the history of Apple. Woz and Jobs work on the Apple I in Steve’s parent’s garage, they announce the Apple II at the West Coast Computer Faire in 1977, Steve struggles with acceptance as he finds out his girlfriend is pregnant. It’s the same story you’ve all likely heard before, and told in the same way.

The movie's representation of the 1977 West Coast Computer Faire vs. reality

The movie’s representation of the 1977 West Coast Computer Faire vs. reality

What It Got Wrong

Like most movies, ‘Jobs’ exaggerates and enhances certain events and aspects of the story for impact. I was expecting this going into the film, and you should too. For example, at the 1977 West Coast Computer Faire, where Apple first demoed the Apple II, the movie depicts Steve Jobs quieting down an entire crowd and dramatically unveiling the computer, almost in a similar fashion to his later keynotes at Apple where he unveiled the iPhone and iPad. As former Apple employees Daniel Kottke and Bill Fernandez explain it, this never happened. Kottke and Fernandez also called out other inaccuracies in the film in an interview, which you can check out here.

‘Jobs’ also gets some technical details wrong, but these are excusable. For example, in the Byte Shop, the computer store which would be come the original retailer for the Apple I, the shelves of the store appear to contain 1981 IBM PC monitors, although the scene in question is supposed to depict the year 1976. All but a few viewers won’t notice these minor oversights, however, and it doesn’t detract from the viewing experience at all. I was also puzzled by the representation of Jony Ive towards the end of the movie. Jony’s character was, undoubtedly the farthest from reality in appearance. Even though his mannerisms and voice were spot-on, the role didn’t quite seem to fit.

Steve Jobs and other original Apple employees outside the garage where Apple began in Jobs.

Steve Jobs and other original Apple employees outside the garage where Apple began in Jobs.

Finally, there’s a lot of skipped scenes in ‘Jobs’. While it would be impossible to comprehensively tell the entire story of Steve’s life within a 2 hour film, some of the areas of focus and neglect in the film were questionable to me. Notably, the movie entirely misses any mention of Ronald Wayne, Apple’s third founder and designer of the original Isaac Newton Apple logo. There’s also little mention of Steve’s endeavors with NeXT, only enough to tie together Steve’s eventual return to Apple. For viewers unfamiliar with Apple’s story, the plot might become a little confusing at times. Although much time was spent on the fact that Steve had a daughter he wouldn’t take responsibility for, no further mention of the issue arose until we see Lisa living happily with the rest of the Jobs family years later. Some clarification here would be nice.

Jobs and Woz working on the original Apple I

Jobs and Woz working on the original Apple I

What It Got Right

For as many things as ‘Jobs’ got wrong, it also got a lot right. I found many of the actors to be great choices for their roles. Notably, Steve Wozniak, played by Josh Gad, and Mike Markkula, played by Dermot Mulroney, seemed incredibly realistic. Their roles helped back up the character of Steve Jobs, showing how his abrasive and often arrogant personality affected not only his co-workers, but friends and family as well. I also really enjoyed how the scenes depicting both the Lisa computer and Steve’s daughter Lisa progressed. By combining and weaving together the events, the movie subtly portrayed Steve’s outward feelings towards the situation with his girlfriend and daughter, and how he truly felt, as expressed through his possessiveness and care towards the Lisa computer project, which was ultimately taken away from him.

Although many have criticized the time period (1975-1997) that ‘Jobs’ depicts as being too limited, I think the right target was hit. Most people are familiar enough with the modern Apple (1998-present), that including the more recent years in the film would’ve only detracted from the level of detail spent describing Steve’s early life. Additionally, as shown in the mediocre opening scene (the first iPod introduction), modern-day Steve Jobs is an incredibly hard role to play. So well known is his character and personality, that perhaps covering more recent events in a way that was anything but perfect would’ve made the film look incredibly amateur and unimpressive.

Screen Shot 2013-08-17 at 12.26.52 PM


When reviewing a movie about Steve Jobs, it’s hard not to draw influence from Pirates Of Silicon Valley, perhaps the most comprehensive film about the rise of Silicon Valley to date. However, it’s important not to confuse the two. ‘Jobs’ is about Steve’s life and experiences at Apple. It isn’t meant to show the technical details of how Apple works, or how the computer industry came to be. It isn’t supposed to detail the intense battle between Microsoft and Apple in the 1980s. It’s about Steve Jobs. And as a movie depicting the early life and personality of such an influential man, I found it thoroughly enjoyable and entertaining.

Ashton Kutcher gets the Jobs done.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

7 Responses to “Review: ‘Jobs’ movie is an intriguing, though exaggerated, peek into Apple’s early years”

  1. Funtechblog says:



  2. PMZanetti says:

    It’s still an incredibly insult to have a moron like Ashton Kutcher play Steve Jobs in a film. Just a horrible insult, and it bares mentioning all the time.


    • marcopeters545 says:

      Maybe you should read a little about Ashton Kutcher before posting a stupid comment like this. Don’t base your judgement on roles he played instead of how he is in real life.


  3. It’s nice to get a thorough review from someone who understands Apple really well. One thing that will probably bug me when I see this movie is that scene in the trailer when Steve walks up to Andy Hertzfeld’s desk, and takes his computer away while telling him he’s working on the Macintosh now. Hertzfeld asks “what’s a Macintosh”. Hertzfeld requested to be transferred to the Macintosh team, and most of Apple’s Apple II engineers knew full well what the Macintosh was. There was no need to change that just for dramatic effect. It is true that Steve recruited Any Hertzfeld in that manner, but they should have portrayed this scene accurately.


  4. The movie was terrible, almost walked out 3 times during the movie, they misrepresent true facts about his life and gloss over important other factors, the movie never got off the ground, if you want a true biography then watch it on Netflix, so so much better.BTW Ashton was a disgrace.


  5. oneokami says:

    I thought the movie was pretty crappy. I’m aware of the apologists that excuse the filmmakers creative liberties but I was annoyed by the glaring inaccuracies/dramatizations in the film (compared to what I know from Jobs’ sanctioned biography). Personally, when it comes to a film that is supposedly meant to tell the story of a real man’s life, I’d prefer you get the story right and tell it accurately rather than juice it up. I consider that disrespectful to the (real) people you’re portraying to others who don’t know them.

    I also realize this is an ~2 hour film and you can’t get including everything in it, but with the odd opening scene with the town hall meeting, the hopping from point A to point C with Jobs’ acknowledgement of his daughter Lisa, almost completely glancing over the time between his ouster from Apple and his return (which was IMO a very important part of his story because he grew and matured in meaningful ways during that time), barely mentioning NeXT, etc and the movie just felt like it lacked cohesion to me.

    I also really took issue with the way it portrayed Jobs’ eventual conflict with Bill Gates regarding Windows being a stolen product. Pirates of Silicon Valley and moreso the biography tell this is a much better/more important way to the audience IMO. What I mean by that is that the audience should realize and understand that as Microsoft “stole” ideas from Apple, many of those ideas were already “stolen” from Xerox. I think that is an absolutely critical point to make if you going to depict of scene of Jobs yelling angrily at Bill Gates over the telephone about being ripped off. This film makes no mention of the real story behind all that whatsoever.

    Overall I can’t say I was all that disappointed with the film because my expectations were already quite low and it was $4.50 matinee ticket I didn’t mind purchasing for the sake of curiosity. But I walked out of that theater feeling confirmed with the feelings I’ve had seen long before this film even debuted at Sundance:

    1. People should read the biography if they want the best, most accurate, compiled story
    2. The Aaron Sorkin-written film will be the better film and probably more accurate since it’s based off the biography


  6. I have been waiting for two months for this movie and I almost let the critic from the NY Times stop me from seeing “Jobs” today. I am so glad that I decided to go. Ashton Kutcher was brilliant. The movie was captivating and pretty close to the facts. There were a few inaccuracies but then it was a movie. The soundtrack is incredible and even the music has a sweet twist at the end. I was so elated leaving the theater. I have followed and admired Steve Jobs since 1989 and I think they did a great job defining him. Brilliance is not always easy.