Skip to main content

ASICS will acquire Runkeeper, following Adidas and Under Armor’s example

runkeeper-asics

Following in the footsteps of competitors, Adidas and Under Armor, ASICS will buy fitness app-maker, Runkeeper. The move was announced on Medium by Runkeeper’s founder, Jason Jacobs, and indicates that all fitness apparel companies clearly see the need to embed tracking technology, and/or tie-in apps with their brands.

Jacobs notes that partnering with ASICS to fulfill the company’s vision made complete sense. Not only is ASICS a running-oriented company, but, the manufacturer’s shoes are ‘by far’ the most popular brand among Runkeeper users.

In the short term, nothing major will change. Runkeeper will continue on its path, and will be improved faster now that it has major infrastructure (and budget) behind it.

From the end-user standpoint, not much will change. Not only will the Runkeeper product carry on, but we will be able to move even faster. We will be able to pursue the vision we’ve set out to pursue all along, with a partner that can bring many resources to bear that we couldn’t fathom having access to on our own.

While Nike opted to develop its own tracking technology and products years ago with the ill-fated Fuel Band lineup, other fitness companies opted to buy-in to existing apps. Under Armor, as an example, now owns MyFitnessPal and Endomondo, and also has its own tracking wearables. Its recently launched ‘RE’ running shoes, and the Healthbox announced at CES show the fitness giant’s focus on adopting modern tech. Adidas, likewise, purchased Runtastic.

While the post claims nothing will change, it would be unusual if ASICS didn’t leverage the partnership to develop embedded tracking tech in to its running shoes. Having a pair of shoes which automatically track runs, and sync with Runkeeper seems like a no-brainer.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

You’re reading 9to5Mac — experts who break news about Apple and its surrounding ecosystem, day after day. Be sure to check out our homepage for all the latest news, and follow 9to5Mac on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn to stay in the loop. Don’t know where to start? Check out our exclusive stories, reviews, how-tos, and subscribe to our YouTube channel

Comments

  1. tinman8443 - 8 years ago

    It would be nice if they would make the features of the premium account available to all.

    • The Isaiah 53:5 Project - 8 years ago

      I was thinking the same thing

    • Chris Cooper (@clcooper) - 8 years ago

      Why would they give away the product that customers are paying for?

      • tinman8443 - 8 years ago

        Because the product becomes shoes instead of just letting you see your stats.

    • pdoobs - 8 years ago

      you realize it’s normal to pay for something that you use, right? they are giving you something for free already and they aren’t asking an insane price for the premium service.

      • tinman8443 - 8 years ago

        I kind of disagree. $50 to look at stats seems very high to me. I like the service, happy to have it. I DO pay for it, because I got it on sale for %50 off. A lower price point would be something I would feel more suitable to the actual level of service provided. If they need $50 for their company to be viable, then so be it. However, if shoes become the core profit center for the business, then SO BE IT. I have not stated that I will change my engagement with their service, in fact if they run another sale next year, I’ll probably buy it again. All I’m saying is that if shoes become the core business to the degree that I can see stats from my own activity, then I welcome that change.

  2. rahhbriley - 8 years ago

    Fuel Band, ill-fated or Tim Cooks Watch research lab?

    I mean he’s on their board, Fuel Band….disbanded months before Watch announcement, and a lot of the Nike talent came to Apple…am I wrong?

  3. Rob Howard (@CousinDirk) - 8 years ago

    TIL that they’re called ASICS not Oasics. Turns out their logo is terrible.