Skip to main content

Apple again bans Hong Kong protest app after threats from China

Apple has made a second U-turn on a Hong Kong protest app. The company initially banned it from the App Store, then changed its mind and allowed it, and has now reversed course again, banning it once more.

We yesterday reported that Apple has also removed the Quartz news app, which has been reporting extensively on the protests. Quartz says Apple took this action at the request of the government.

Both moves follow vague threats about “consequences” from Chinese state media…


As we’ve noted, the Hong Kong protest app could be used in two rather different ways.

HKmap Live let people track police activity on the streets of Hong Kong, and could clearly be used in two very different ways.

It could be used by protesters who want to evade the police, or it could be used to allow citizens to avoid trouble spots where there is a danger of being caught up in conflicts between the police and protesters.

That latter argument has been bolstered by a violent clash earlier this week, where protesters threw objects at police officers, and one of those officers shot a protester in the chest with live rounds, as the Independent reported.

Apple originally rejected the app on the former grounds.

Your app contains content — or facilitates, enables, and encourages an activity — that is not legal… Specifically, the app allowed users to evade law enforcement.

However, the developer argued that it was both legal and in line with official police policy, which is to issue warnings when a gathering is declared unlawful, before taking any other action. Since that action has so far included the routine use of tear gas and “non-lethal” bullets, as well as live rounds, the safety argument seems a strong one.

Chinese state media yesterday aggressively criticized Apple’s decision to allow the app into its store, and made threats about unspecified “consequences.”

‘Apple’s approval for the app obviously helps rioters,’ the article said. ‘Does this mean Apple intended to be an accomplice to the rioters?’

The article then cautioned that: ‘The map app is just the tip of the iceberg,’ alleging a song supporting Hong Kong independence had also appeared on its music store.

‘Nobody wants to drag Apple into the lingering unrest in Hong Kong. But people have reason to assume that Apple is mixing business with politics, and even illegal acts,’ it said.

‘Apple has to think about the consequences of its unwise and reckless decision.’

Apple’s statement about again banning the protest app

The New York Times reports that Apple has removed the app from the App Store at the request of law enforcement.

Apple said it was withdrawing the app, called, from its App Store just days after approving it because authorities in Hong Kong said protesters were using it to attack police in the semiautonomous city […]

In a statement on Wednesday, Apple said, ‘The app displays police locations and we have verified with the Hong Kong Cybersecurity and Technology Crime Bureau that the app has been used to target and ambush police, threaten public safety, and criminals have used it to victimize residents in areas where they know there is no law enforcement. This app violates our guidelines and local laws.’

Many are criticizing Apple for giving in to pressure from China, John Gruber among them.

I still haven’t seen which local laws it violates, other than the unwritten law of pissing off Beijing.

This is a bad look for Apple, if you think capitulation is a bad look.

One series of tweets put the safety argument well.

As one small example: The night before last, Hong Kong police fired tear gas on a busy road where cars were going full speed, including on an elevated highway. That’s an extremely dangerous situation for a driver, who can be incapacitated. People need to know where the police are.

Tear gas in Hong Kong used to be unheard of. Now I’ve seen HK cops fire tear gas because they were taunted and someone got them good with a zinger. The use of this substance has become absolutely routine, and it can be deployed without warning in densely populated neighborhoods.

A point that needs reiterating is that the app doesn’t contravene any Hong Kong law that I am aware of. This app helps answer questions like, ‘Will I get shot with a bean bag round if I come out of this MTR station, because the police raised a colored flag I can’t see?’

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Apple iPhone 11 case deals on Amazon
You’re reading 9to5Mac — experts who break news about Apple and its surrounding ecosystem, day after day. Be sure to check out our homepage for all the latest news, and follow 9to5Mac on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn to stay in the loop. Don’t know where to start? Check out our exclusive stories, reviews, how-tos, and subscribe to our YouTube channel

Photo: Shutterstock

Check out 9to5Mac on YouTube for more Apple news:



Avatar for Ben Lovejoy Ben Lovejoy

Ben Lovejoy is a British technology writer and EU Editor for 9to5Mac. He’s known for his op-eds and diary pieces, exploring his experience of Apple products over time, for a more rounded review. He also writes fiction, with two technothriller novels, a couple of SF shorts and a rom-com!

Ben Lovejoy's favorite gear