Skip to main content

Spotify audiobooks app update rejected by Apple three times over in-app purchase rules

As described in a new update to its Time to Play Fair website, Spotify has faced the ire of App Review over its attempt to launch an audiobooks store inside the Spotify app on iPhone. The app was rejected three times by App Review due to violations of Apple’s In-App Purchase rules, before finally being approved on Tuesday. The eventually-approved app experience entails a nine step process, far more complicated than Spotify ideally wanted to offer, to comply with App Store rules.

Spotify says this is yet another case of Apple’s anticompetitive dominance on the app economy. Spotify first filed a formal complaint to the European Commission back in 2019 The commission is still investigating.

Spotify’s original aim was to offer a simple store experience inside the Spotify app for users to browse and purchase audiobooks. This would mean opening the Spotify app, finding an audiobook and buying directly inside the app. However, as they don’t want to give Apple a 30% cut of the revenue, they are not allowed to offer in-app book purchasing. Instead, they must direct users to the web instead.

However, Apple also carefully regulates how apps can inform users in the app that a store experience is available outside the app.

Top comment by S. Jobs

Liked by 11 people
If Apple is forced to have more than one AppStore, I hope that Nintendo, Tesla, PlayStation, Microsoft, Amazon and everyone else is also forced to open their PRIVATE platforms to allow third-party apps and external payments. Also, remember that Apple doesn't have the largest marketshare (worldwide) in smartphones AND that iDevices are considered luxury tech products (which happen to have so many cheaper alternatives with equivalent functionality), so the argument of "this platform has become essential" is weak. Regulators should first force Android and any other entry-level OS and phone manufacturer to open up their bootloaders to allow Linux, and any other OS, to be installed. THAT's what I would call opening up a "critically essential platform" to any third-party app. Also, if the argument is that "phones" have become so essential in our lives, then only allow third-party ESSENTIAL apps that provide critical day-to-day functionality (so, only third-party phone dialers, SMS reader/senders, emails, e-wallet or card payments) because that's what you essentially need in a mobile phone nowadays. If any person or company wants more than that (for example, forcing Apple to provide access to third-party games or non-critical, non-essential apps), then definitely force any other platform like Nintendo or the PSN to also offer third-party access to publish other non-essential apps. Why would a game in a smartphone be "more essential" than a game in a console or portable console?
View all comments

So, Spotify set out to create a flow that not fall foul of Apple’s rules. As reported by the New York Times, Spotify said that two lawyers were intimately involved with the design and development process. This resulted in a convoluted nine step process that involved opting in to receive an email that would include the audiobook’s price and a link to purchase it.

After initially approving the app, Apple blocked subsequent Spotify app submissions. Spotify changed the flow to not include a purchase button in the received email. Instead, the email would link to Spotify’s store on the web. Apple rejected this, too.

Apple said apps are not allowed to send a direct call-to-action email to users in lieu of offering in-app purchases. Spotify finally relented and removed the email steps and all links to the web store. Customers are now expected to know that they need to navigate to the Spotify website in order to make a purchase. Apple approved this version of the app this week.

Nothing in this retelling is particularly surprising — Apple’s rules around IAP are relatively clear here and Spotify has fought Apple over very similar points before — but it’s another opportunity for Spotify to highlight what it sees as an unfair playing ground. Apple certainly isn’t budging unless a court compels them to.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

You’re reading 9to5Mac — experts who break news about Apple and its surrounding ecosystem, day after day. Be sure to check out our homepage for all the latest news, and follow 9to5Mac on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn to stay in the loop. Don’t know where to start? Check out our exclusive stories, reviews, how-tos, and subscribe to our YouTube channel

Comments

Author

Avatar for Benjamin Mayo Benjamin Mayo

Benjamin develops iOS apps professionally and covers Apple news and rumors for 9to5Mac. Listen to Benjamin, every week, on the Happy Hour podcast. Check out his personal blog. Message Benjamin over email or Twitter.


Manage push notifications

notification icon
We would like to show you notifications for the latest news and updates.
notification icon
Please wait...processing
notification icon
We would like to show you notifications for the latest news and updates.
notification icon
Please wait...processing