In the latest twist in the iPod antitrust lawsuit that has already given us a deposition of Apple co-founder Steve Jobs and details about Apple’s deal with record labels to sell music in the iTunes Store, a judge ruled on Monday that the trial will continue even though there are no plaintiffs left.
Yes, you read that correctly. Every single plaintiff in the case has been disqualified. Marianna Rosen, the last complainant standing, was discovered to have never purchased an iPod that was affected by the song-deleting software updates in question.
Technically, Rosen did own two iPods that were impacted by the issue, but Apple’s lawyers were able to prove that the credit card used in the transaction belonged to her husband’s business, not Rosen herself. Because of that, she was not legally considered the “purchaser” of the iPods, and could not sue Apple.
The Associated Press notes that roughly 8 million people bought iPods affected by the updates, and the judge in the case has ruled that if the lawyers suing the Cupertino company can find one of those 8 million willing to serve as the plaintiff by Tuesday, the trial can proceed.
Those lawyers have said that they’ve already located several people who may be willing to fill the role. Apple’s own legal team will then attempt to determine whether they are truly eligible. If none of them are, the case may end up being dismissed altogether.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
What a sham. Effin’ lawyers.
Look, they’ve been working on this for years. They should have known better. They weren’t prepared. Game over.
This is a waste of the Taxpayer’s (read – you and I) money. I totally agree with iSRS and TechSHIZZLE – this is a sham and the Judge plays right into it and allows it to continue!
Where is Justice Blind – Not in this Judge’s courtroom!
“This is a waste of the Taxpayer’s (read – you and I) money.”
That type of mental terrorism is only specific to Brits; it’s not relevant to Yanks as they are not subject to that particular type of oppression.
Not sure I understand your post, but . . .
Our taxpayer $$$$ support the court system – so anything like this waste of a Judge and court time is paid from the taxes we pay into the federal government. If this were a fair and equitable system, the clowns – sorry, lawyers – who filed this case would have to reimburse what it’s cost the legal system, as well as Apple’s legal costs so far, to take this case as far as it’s gone.
Again – It’s a waste of the American Taxpayer’s money.
It seems to me that this is a great opportunity for Apple to put this to bed. It is easy for the prosecution to re-file, but much harder for them to be successful with these proceedings.
I think that the Judge should penalized the lawyers for not doing their job… in 9 years!
And congrat Apple’s lawyers to check any point in the trail…
It seems to me that all this (although could be correcto to sue Apple) was only moved by lawyer’s greediness… “We took $300 millions from Apple!” (Very similar to the iBook’s case!)
Wow. Someone really, really wants to cash in on this.